rcmnd

LawlessBook

by Leah Litman

Who uses, recommends or left Lawless, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.

1 person

Kate Shaw
recommended

Well, since we were talking about whether these justices are really just partisans in robes, I have to recommend my podcast co-host, Leah Litman's book, Lawless, which is a very accessible and pretty scathing indictment of the Roberts court and I think a fullthroated defense of the thesis that the Republican justices, as she calls them, are just partisans in robes. So, recommend that one.

Answering The Ezra Klein Show's closing question, three books to recommend, in “The Supreme Court Is Backing Trump's Power Grab” (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/02/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-kate-shaw.html). Quoted from the episode's YouTube auto-captions.

2025-09-02·youtube.com ↗

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:

Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.