Recommendations you can check.
Who uses, recommends or left Magit, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.
2 people
Magit is still the best thing going. For now.
Post about building a personal macOS Markdown viewer with an agent, and what Emacs culture predicts about that.
2026-05-12·sockpuppet.org ↗
For version control I use git on the command line and through magit, which is perhaps the greatest of all Emacs modes.
His written "Uses This" interview, from GitHub's early years.
2010-12-03·usesthis.com ↗
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.