AI research engineer working on LLMs; author of the Ahead of AI newsletter and of Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch).
liked
I am not affiliated with any of the tools mentioned in this article, but one nice thing about Ollama is that they also optionally support open-weight models hosted in the cloud
A walkthrough of running coding agents against local open-weight models; he names the models and tools he uses.
Co-founder of WordPress and founder of Automattic; blogs at ma.tt.
recommended
The easiest way to feel this for yourself is to run one locally tonight: install Ollama or LM Studio, pull a small Qwen model, and talk to an intelligence that lives entirely on your own machine, no cloud required.
Post giving WordPress community members a reading/homework list on AI after a WordCamp keynote
Creator of Flask and Jinja2; writes about software and AI tooling at lucumr.pocoo.org.
uses
First and foremost, I use this to talk to local models hosted by Ollama, but secondarily I also use it to interface with other remote services like OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepSeek.
Post describing the AI tools he uses day to day as a techy consumer. This item is Open WebUI, which he uses to talk to Ollama-hosted local models.
Co-founder of Ethereum; writes on cryptography, economics and public goods at vitalik.eth.limo.
mixed
I used ollama before, but when I admitted to this in public half of Twitter told me that I was a noob and llama-server was clearly better and I must have been living in a very deep cave if I did not already know that. I tested their theory.
His write-up of the local-first, privacy-hardened LLM setup he actually runs — hardware, models, agent tooling and sandboxing.
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Hardware, services4 years
Software5 years
Podcasts, courses, other8 years
Books25 years
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.