rcmnd

OllamaSoftware

by Ollama

Who uses, recommends or left Ollama, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.

4 people

AI research engineer working on LLMs; author of the Ahead of AI newsletter and of Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch).
liked

I am not affiliated with any of the tools mentioned in this article, but one nice thing about Ollama is that they also optionally support open-weight models hosted in the cloud

A walkthrough of running coding agents against local open-weight models; he names the models and tools he uses.

2026-06-27·magazine.sebastianraschka.com ↗

Co-founder of WordPress and founder of Automattic; blogs at ma.tt.
recommended

The easiest way to feel this for yourself is to run one locally tonight: install Ollama or LM Studio, pull a small Qwen model, and talk to an intelligence that lives entirely on your own machine, no cloud required.

Post giving WordPress community members a reading/homework list on AI after a WordCamp keynote

2026-08-20·ma.tt ↗

Creator of Flask and Jinja2; writes about software and AI tooling at lucumr.pocoo.org.
uses

First and foremost, I use this to talk to local models hosted by Ollama, but secondarily I also use it to interface with other remote services like OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepSeek.

Post describing the AI tools he uses day to day as a techy consumer. This item is Open WebUI, which he uses to talk to Ollama-hosted local models.

2025-01-30·lucumr.pocoo.org ↗

Co-founder of Ethereum; writes on cryptography, economics and public goods at vitalik.eth.limo.
mixed

I used ollama before, but when I admitted to this in public half of Twitter told me that I was a noob and llama-server was clearly better and I must have been living in a very deep cave if I did not already know that. I tested their theory.

His write-up of the local-first, privacy-hardened LLM setup he actually runs — hardware, models, agent tooling and sandboxing.

2026-04-02·vitalik.eth.limo ↗

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:

Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.