Recommendations you can check.
Who uses, recommends or left pandoc, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.
3 people
I'm visually tired of beamer slides (mainly because too many people use the same style), and I use pandoc to create HTML5 slides.
His Uses This interview, on the R and publishing toolchain he works in.
2012-11-27·usesthis.com ↗
I use pandoc's extended markdown for lecture notes, letters, slide presentations, handouts, and short articles.
The Setup (usesthis.com) interview: the writing and programming setup behind pandoc.
2012-05-25·usesthis.com ↗
If a document is going to be simple (a review, a lecture, a letter, etc), I usually write it in Markdown. This can be converted to pretty much any useful format by way of Pandoc.
The Setup (usesthis.com) interview: an essay-length account of his research and writing toolchain.
2010-10-17·usesthis.com ↗
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.