rcmnd

Poor Charlie's AlmanackBook

The Wit and Wisdom of Charles T. Munger

by Charles T. Munger, 2006

Who uses, recommends or left Poor Charlie's Almanack, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.

4 people

Founder of Terraform Industries and formerly a physicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory; writes about energy, space and manufacturing.
loved

Fascinating book, good to have a web browser handy when reading it.

His running 'Book reviews' page, notes on books he's read, marked with a thumbs-up for ones he recommends.

2024-10-01·caseyhandmer.wordpress.com ↗

Angel investor and co-founder of AngelList; writes and podcasts at nav.al.
loved

Poor Charlie's Almanac, A Cultural History of Physics, Total Freedom (Krishnamurti).

Replying on X to “can u share some more of your favourite books please?”

2015-03-21·x.com ↗

Co-founder of Stripe. Publishes the contents of his bookshelf, marking the standouts.
loved

On his bookshelf, marked as one he thought was particularly great.

patrickcollison.com ↗

Zurich-based investor who ran the Aquamarine Fund from 1997 to 2025 and wrote The Education of a Value Investor.
loved

Another marvelous glimpse inside the mind of a master is Poor Charlie’s Almanack: The Wit and Wisdom of Charles T Munger, which includes his eye-opening analysis of the causes of human misjudgment.

Spier's standing 'My Favorite Books for Investing and Life' page; no publication date shown, so the date is the sitemap lastmod for the page.

guyspier.com ↗

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:

Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.