Recommendations you can check.
Who uses, recommends or left Processing, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.
2 people
I've dabbled in Processing, and thought it was awesome, but haven't had enough time to devote to doing anything significant with it so far.
Her Uses This interview, on the tools behind her interactive fiction and criticism.
2011-02-07·usesthis.com ↗
Most of my time is spent with Emacs, Processing, Eclipse, Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop CS3.
His Uses This interview, on the machines and design tools behind his data work.
2009-05-02·usesthis.com ↗
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.