rcmnd

The MartianBook

by Andy Weir, 2011

Who uses, recommends or left The Martian, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.

6 people

Programmer and educator. Keeps a public bookshelf with a short comment on every book.
loved

When an engineer or a scientist decides to write science fiction, it’s usually either very bad or very good. This one is very good.

Marked “Great book!” on his public bookshelf.

2026-08-16·rakhim.org ↗

Founder of Terraform Industries and formerly a physicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory; writes about energy, space and manufacturing.
loved

I love this book.

His running 'Book reviews' page, notes on books he's read, marked with a thumbs-up for ones he recommends.

2020-07-26·caseyhandmer.wordpress.com ↗

Writer and illustrator behind the long-form blog Wait But Why and author of What's Our Problem?
loved

Book for sure. The movie was solid and enjoyable, but kind of just another pretty good movie. The book was special.

His first reader mailbag, answering questions on everything from books to the gear he carries. Answering a reader asking whether he preferred the book or the film of The Martian.

2016-05-06·waitbutwhy.com ↗

Astrophysicist at the University of Rochester; works on the search for life elsewhere and wrote The Little Book of Aliens and Light of the Stars.
loved

#1. The Martian: A Novel by Andy Weir. This book is a complete surprise.

His summer reading list, in his own NPR 13.7: Cosmos & Culture column.

2014-07-01·npr.org ↗

Engineer at Amp/Sourcegraph. Author of "Writing an Interpreter in Go".
liked

Read that, very good!

Replying in his own thread, after Deva suggested it.

2026-08-16·x.com ↗

recommended

Try 'The Martian'. 384 pages, nonstop momentum, solid prose. Beats any 900 page slog.

Reply to Thorsten Ball's request for a page turner under 400 pages.

2026-08-16·x.com ↗

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:

Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.