rcmnd

The Selfish GeneBook

by Richard Dawkins, 2006

Who uses, recommends or left The Selfish Gene, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.

4 people

Programmer and educator. Keeps a public bookshelf with a short comment on every book.
loved

Having an interest in genetics and molecular biology, I was completely enchanted by the narrative.

Marked “Great book!” on his public bookshelf.

2026-08-16·rakhim.org ↗

Essayist and programmer; co-founder of Viaweb and of the startup accelerator Y Combinator.
loved

At one extreme, something you read can change your whole way of thinking. The Selfish Gene did this to me. It was like suddenly seeing the other interpretation of an ambiguous image: you can treat genes rather than organisms as the protagonists, and evolution becomes easier to understand when you do.

'The Shape of the Essay Field' (dated June 2025, no day given), on degrees of surprise in writing; he offers this book as the extreme case.

2025-06-01·paulgraham.com ↗

Investor and writer; former CTO of Coinbase, author of The Network State, and founder of Network School.
recommended

Foundation, The Lessons of History, Unqualified Reservations, A Short History of Nearly Everything, The Selfish Gene, Albion's Seed, War and Peace and War, Stalin's War, Energy and Civilization, Who We Are and How We Got Here, The Ancient City, The Fourth Turning, The Grey Lady Winked

The draft reading list for his Network School, in the “Macrohistory” section.

2025-02-02·balajis.com ↗

Professor of Human Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University and author of The Secret of Our Success and The WEIRDest People in the World.
recommended

I really picked this book because for me, and I think for lots of people, it was an entry point into thinking about applying evolutionary principles to human behaviour. In a very user-friendly way, it gives you some of the basic tools you can use to start thinking about it.

Five Books interview on cultural evolution

2016-10-13·fivebooks.com ↗

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:

Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.