rcmnd

The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi EconomyBook

by Adam Tooze, 2007

Who uses, recommends or left The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.

3 people

Pseudonymous independent researcher and essayist writing on gwern.net about statistics, psychology, genetics and AI.
loved

A fascinating account of the economic transformation of Germany under the Nazis

Gwern's compiled star-rated reviews of books he has read since ~1997 (page last modified 2022-10-13).

2022-10-13·gwern.net ↗

Writes on effective altruism, energy and the arithmetic behind arguments people repeat — including how much electricity a chatbot query actually uses.
liked

Europe The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy

His list of especially good nonfiction audiobooks, chosen for content and narration.

2024-06-15·blog.andymasley.com ↗

Statistics professor at Carnegie Mellon University who writes the long-running blog Three-Toed Sloth and the Bactra Review of books.
likedaffiliate link

This is immensely detailed, immensely readable, and immensely self-assured. It's also so deep into intricate controversies among economic, military and political historians that I feel quite unable to judge it. I will say that I thought I appreciated how much more backwards the European economies were than America in the first half of the 20th century, but even so much of this was eye-opening.

His monthly "Books to Read While the Algae Grow in Your Fur" post for June 2020 — the books he read that month and feels he can recommend.

2020-06-30·bactra.org ↗

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:

Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.