This is an extremely well-written book focused on startup product strategy.
From his “Summer Reading” essay, in the section he introduces as “my four favorite strategy books”.
2021-08-05·askgib.substack.com ↗
Recommendations you can check.
by Peter A. Thiel, 2014
Who uses, recommends or left Zero to One, in their own words: each a verbatim quote with a link to where it was said.
5 people
This is an extremely well-written book focused on startup product strategy.
From his “Summer Reading” essay, in the section he introduces as “my four favorite strategy books”.
2021-08-05·askgib.substack.com ↗
I think Peter Teal’s book is self recommending and is an excellent book, Zero to One
Books he would prescribe to a would-be entrepreneur (the transcript misspells Thiel as “Teal”).
2018-01-01·tim.blog ↗
Peter Thiel described the period well when he wrote in his excellent book Zero to One:
Griffin introduces a Thiel quote while telling a short-selling story from the 1990s in his Jim Chanos post.
2016-01-09·25iq.com ↗
Zero To One, Hard Thing about Hard Things, High Growth Handbook, AI Superpowers
The draft reading list for his Network School, in the “Tech” section.
2025-02-02·balajis.com ↗
Thoughts on building innovative new companies. There’s some startup BS in Zero to One that turned me off, but still enough interesting insight to recommend the book.
On his public list of books he has read, with his notes.
2016-01-01·radex.io ↗
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.