Recommendations you can check.
British military historian, author of Stalingrad, Berlin and The Second World War.
6 things
The Face of BattleBook John Keegan
The very first historian to inspire me was John Keegan, who I studied under at Sandhurst, because he wrote The Face of Battle, which was one of the key moments in the turning points of military history.
Five Books interview on the best books about World War II
2019-06-01·fivebooks.com ↗
Life and FateBook Vasily Grossman
These were the notebooks that we worked on in Moscow and one realised that here was most of the raw material for Life and Fate which I think is probably the most important work of fiction about World War II.
Five Books interview on the best books about World War II
2019-06-01·fivebooks.com ↗
HitlerBook Ian Kershaw
But I don't see Kershaw's work on Hitler really ever being surpassed.
Five Books interview on the best books about World War II
2019-06-01·fivebooks.com ↗
Leningrad: The Epic Siege of World War II, 1941-1944Book Anna Reid
But Anna Reid's book goes far further because, with excellent research in archives which weren't available before, she is able to show how totally cynical Stalin's attitude was to Leningrad. Indeed it was a major factor in the appalling loss of life and suffering, which is very hard to appreciate.
Five Books interview on the best books about World War II
2019-06-01·fivebooks.com ↗
A Woman in BerlinBook Anonymous
This book, A Woman in Berlin, is one of the great diaries of the whole war. Although it was published anonymously we do know the name of the woman who wrote it now.
Five Books interview on the best books about World War II
2019-06-01·fivebooks.com ↗
BloodlandsBook Timothy Snyder
It is a remarkable work, not just of scholarship and research but, above all, of a fresh angle on the way that the inter-reaction between Nazism and Stalinism actually caused such appalling levels of hatred and murder in this particular area.
Five Books interview on the best books about World War II
2019-06-01·fivebooks.com ↗
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.