rcmnd

DoorDashCompany

Local commerce and food delivery platform

8 things

PostgreSQLSoftware

liked

We already had lots of experience and expertise with Postgres and Apache Cassandra , so these would remain our data stores.

DoorDash keeping Postgres as a data store in the new stack

doordash.engineering ↗·2021-05-04Wrong?

CassandraSoftware

liked

We already had lots of experience and expertise with Postgres and Apache Cassandra , so these would remain our data stores.

DoorDash keeping Cassandra as a data store in the new stack

doordash.engineering ↗·2021-05-04Wrong?

KotlinSoftware

recommended

After surveying a number of different languages, we chose Kotlin for its rich ecosystem, interoperability with Java, and developer friendliness.

Why DoorDash migrated its backend services from Python to Kotlin

doordash.engineering ↗·2021-05-04Wrong?

KafkaSoftware

uses

We quickly agreed on gRPC as our mechanism for synchronous service-to-service communication, using Apache Kafka as a message queue.

DoorDash's new backend stack: gRPC and Kafka

doordash.engineering ↗·2021-05-04Wrong?

gRPCSoftware

uses

We quickly agreed on gRPC as our mechanism for synchronous service-to-service communication

DoorDash choosing gRPC for service-to-service calls

doordash.engineering ↗·2021-05-04Wrong?

ScalaSoftware

uses

this service was written in Scala mainly because Python was not a good fit for CPU-intensive tasks.

DoorDash's first microservice, Deep Red, was written in Scala

doordash.engineering ↗·2020-12-02Wrong?

PythonSoftware

mixed

the dynamic typing nature of the language made it difficult to verify that changes didn’t have unforeseen effects at runtime.

DoorDash on the limits of Python in its monolith

doordash.engineering ↗·2020-12-02Wrong?

DjangoSoftware

disliked

On top of that, our monolith was built on old versions of Python 2 and Django , which were rapidly entering end-of-life for security support.

Why DoorDash left its Django monolith

doordash.engineering ↗·2021-05-04Wrong?

Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.

The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.

A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.

The small bar beside a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.

The bar shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Full and green is recent. It drains, and turns amber and then grey, as the post gets older.

What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The bar is empty after about:

A striped bar means the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no bar.