Recommendations you can check.
Writer on learning and author of Ultralearning and Get Better at Anything; known for the MIT Challenge and the Year Without English.
10 things
PsychBook Paul Bloom
Despite having read a few bookshelves worth of academic psychology texts, I enjoyed Yale professor Paul Bloom's survey of the field. Because understanding psychology cannot be divorced from understanding its history, I enjoyed Bloom's birds-eye view of the field from the past to the present day.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
The RepublicBook Plato
To my surprise, I really enjoyed The Republic. It is both well-written and weird, which puts it above many other famous philosophical books that are too obscure to be easily read.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
Social Learning TheoryBook Albert Bandura
Social Learning Theory is a difficult book to summarize, but it has profoundly impacted my thinking.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
Why Knowledge MattersBook E. D. Hirsch
In this 2016 book, Hirsch presents a sweeping curriculum change in French schools as evidence that misguided educational theories are undermining our children's learning.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
How We ReasonBook Philip Johnson-Laird
I had read Johnson-Laird's original work, Mental Models, last year. It was nice to see an in-depth follow-up on how the theory has developed in the subsequent two decades.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
Creativity in ScienceBook Dean Simonton
This book surveys theories of creativity, contrasting four competing explanations: expertise, genius, society, and chance, in offering a model for how creativity works. Simonton's work provides a nice hybrid between the purely anecdotal work of biographers and the data-driven work of experimental scientists.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
Cognitive Behavior TherapyBook Judith Beck
I recently reviewed Beck's book, which is written as a practical guide for therapists implementing CBT.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
How Languages are LearnedBook Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada
To that end, I read a few different books from the field of second language acquisition (SLA) over the summer, and even wrote a review of How Languages are Learned.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
The Science of Learning PhysicsBook José Mestre and Jennifer Docktor
Mestre and Docktor tackle this challenge by reviewing the large body of literature on learning physics. I plan on writing a full review of their book, which I found to be a helpful summary.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
Beginning to ReadBook Marilyn Jager Adams
Marilyn Jager Adams's extensive review of the literature concluded essentially the same thing in 1994.
His year-end post picking ten favourites out of the roughly forty to fifty books he finished in 2023.
2023-12-19·scotthyoung.com ↗
Every entry is a verbatim quote and a link to the public post it came from. Nothing is paraphrased. If it is not on record somewhere public, it is not here.
The verdict is what they actually said: loved and liked are explicit; recommended means they told others to get it; uses means they only say they use it; read is a book on their public shelf with no verdict; mixed and disliked are kept too.
A dashed affiliate link, sponsored or their own label means the post disclosed a relationship. It is shown, never hidden.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is for its kind of thing.
The shading behind a date shows how dated a recommendation is, for its kind of thing. Fully green is recent. It drains a quarter at a time as the post gets older, and is empty once it reads as dated.
What counts as old depends on the thing. A laptop praised four years ago has been replaced twice; a book loved twenty years ago is probably still loved. The shading is gone after about:
Stripes mean the post carries no date and the date shown is an estimate. No date at all, no shading.